Aquatic Nature. 31 December 2023. 113-121
https://doi.org/10.23135/an.2023.3.2.5

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • 1. Introduction

  • 2. Materials and methods

  • 3. Results and discussion

1. Introduction

Campylaephora boydenii (E.S.Gepp) Barros-Barreto & Maggs (Ceramiaceae, Florideophyceae) is an endemic red algal species distributed in the Northwest Pacific region such as Korea, China, and Japan (Boo and Lee 1994; Guiry and Guiry 2023). All nine species of the genus Campylaephora J.Agardh were recognized with a full cortication of thallus, dichotomous and pseudodichotomous branchings with adventitious branches (Cho et al. 2001; Cho and Riosmena-Rodriguez 2008; Barros-Barreto et al. 2023). The DNA sequence-based taxonomy and phylogeny of species became common in the genus because of its morphological plasticity and wide range of distributions (Maggs et al. 2002; Won and Cho 2011). Some ceramiacean species used in population demography and inter-species diversity based on variable organelle markers (Yang et al. 2008, 2009; Bruce and Saunders 2015). Organellar genomes of the ceramialean species were successfully used in phylogeny and evolution studies (Lee et al. 2016; Díaz-Tapia et al. 2019), however, a few plastid and mitochondrial genomes are available in the tribe Ceramieae such as Campylaephora sungminbooi (J.R.Hughey & G.H.Boo) Barros-Barreto & Maggs (Hughey and Boo 2016), Centroceras clavulatum (C.Agardh) Montagne (Díaz-Tapia et al. 2019), Ceramothamnion japonicum (Okmura) M.J.Wynne & C.W.Schneider (Yang et al. 2015; Lee et al. 2016) and unidentified Gayliella sp. (MK814659; Díaz-Tapia et al. 2019). Thus new plastid genome of C. boydenii will provide significant information to increase available molecular markers and their applications in studies such as ecology, genetic diversity and phylogeny.

2. Materials and methods

In the present study, live materials were obtained from the collection site, Namsungri, Haenam, Jeonnam, Korea (34.321238 N, 126.601642 E) (Fig. 1A-1B) and thalli were transferred to the laboratory along with field waters. High-quality total DNA was extracted from live materials (ca. 1 g wet weight) cleaned by sterilized seawater using NucleoBond AXG 100 Kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany), and leftover thalli dried and kept as voucher specimen ECY.CB1905NSR.001. Total 10 individuals were collected, dried, and kept with silica-gel in the laboratory herbarium of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (www.kiost.ac.kr, ecyang@kiost.ac.kr) under the voucher number (ECY.CB1905NSR.001-ECY.CB1905NSR.010). The identity of the specimen was confirmed by using standard sequencing of rbcL and BLAST searches (https://blast.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov). The quality and quantity of total DNA were tested by using the Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The total quantity of DNA was 200 ng (19.2 ng/ul concentration) with purity ratios 260/280 = 1.77 and 260/230 = 1.57. The MGIEasy DNA Library Preparation Kit (MGI Tech, Shenzhen, China) was used for the NGS library construction and followed by whole genome sequencing using MGISEQ-2000 (LAS, Gimpo, Korea). From a total of 10 GB raw data, the plastid contig was assembled with the NOVOPlasty V.4.3.1 (Dierckxsens et al. 2017). Runs of perl script NOVOPlasty4.3.1.pl repeated two times using default configure options but different reference seeds, i.e., rbcL of C. boydenii MW366520 and DQ350389. Plastid genome was confirmed by aligning raw reads on assembly using the protocols for sequencing depth and coverage map with BWA V.0.7.17 and SAMtools V.1.16.1 (Ni et al. 2023). Annotation was done with the Geneious Prime V.2023.0.1 (www.geneious.com) assisted by a Ceramothamnion japonicum (NC_031174, Lee et al. 2016) and Campylaephora sungminbooi (NC_031211, Hughey and Boo 2016) as reference genomes, tRNAscan-SE online (Lowe and Chan 2016), and NCBI BLAST searches. The plastid genome (ptDNA) map drew in OGDRAW online (https://chlorobox. mpimp-golm.mpg.de/OGDraw.html, Greiner et al. 2019) and CPGView (Liu et al. 2023). The phylogeny of Campylaephora was constructed by using rbcL (total 1,467 bp). The maximum likelihood phylogeny and bootstrap (-# 1,000) analysis were performed with the GTR+G model and default settings (-f a) by using RAxML V.8.2.12 (Stamatakis 2014).

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksp/2023-003-02/N0310030205/images/ksp_03_02_05_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Images of Campylaephora boydenii (Ceamiaceae, Florideophyceae). The photographs were taken by Eun Chan Yang from intertidal zone of the Namsungri, Haenam, Jeonnam, Korea (34.321238 N, 126.601642 E) at 20th May 2019. (A) Thallus under water in tidal pool. Thalli are bright to rosy-red color, uniseriate filamentous, completely corticated and densely entangled on Sargassum sp. (B) Typical dichotomous branches and moderately inrolled apical tip of C. boydenii (Voucher ID: ECY.CB1905NSR.001) were found under the stereo microscope.

3. Results and discussion

The rbcL phylogeny of Campylaephora showed monophyly of the genus (91% bootstrap support; Fig. 2) and the closer relationship of C. boydenii to C. sungminbooi, C. gardneri (Kylin) Barros-Barreto & Maggs and unidentified Campylaephora sp. GQ179819 (64% bootstrap support). The C. boydenii ECY.CB1905NSR.001 collected from Namsungri (Haenam, Korea OQ731916) grouped with those from Korea (Anin AY945781, Hoidong AY770656, and Jindo EF613510) and Japan (Hakodate DQ350389 and Uranohama MW366520) (100% bootstrap support). The rbcL sequence identity in C. boydenii ranged from 99.68% (between Namsungri, Haenam, Korea and Uranohama, Japan MW366520) to 100% (between Anin, Gangwon, Korea AY945781 and Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan DQ350389).

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksp/2023-003-02/N0310030205/images/ksp_03_02_05_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Phylogeny of the tribe Ceramieae including (Ceramiaceae, Florideophyceae) based on rbcL. Three species with plastid genomes are indicated in bold and followed by accession number and total length. A total 29 species included eight Campylaephora, two Carpoblepharis, one Celeceras, one Centeroceras, two Ceramium, 10 Ceramothamnion, five Pseudoceramium, two Yoneshiguea, species. The Centroceras is considered an outgroup because the genus was basal positioned in the recent study. The maximum likelihood (ML) phylogeny of reconstructed by using RAxML V.8.2.12 with GTR+G model and default settings. The monophyly of each node was supported by bootstrap values (>50%) from 1,000 replications under the same evolutionary model of the ML search. The following sequences were used: Campylaephora boydenii EF613510 (Cho et al. 2008b), C. boydenii AY945781 (Cho et al. 2008a), C. boydenii DQ350389 (Yang et al. 2008), C. boydenii AY770656 (Yang et al. 2008), C. boydenii OQ731916 (this study), C. boydenii MW366520 (Barros-Barreto et al. 2023), C. sungminbooi NC_031211 (Hughey and Boo 2016), Campylaephora sp. GQ179819 (Barros-Barreto et al. 2023), C. gardneri GQ252455 (unpublished), C. hypnaeoides AY945768 (Cho et al. 2008a), C. crassa EF613503 (Cho et al. 2008b), C. borealis EF613499 (Cho et al. 2008b), C. kondoi EF186999 (Yang et al. 2008), C. kondoi AY295176 (Yang and Boo 2004), C. kondoi AY770644 (Yang et al. 2008), Pseudoceramium inkyuii AF521798 (Cho et al. 2003a), P. tenerrimum AF521805 (Cho et al. 2003a), P. brevizonatum AF259491 (Lin et al. 2001), P. paniculatum EF613513 (Cho et al. 2008b), P. clarionense DQ458933 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006), Yoneshiguea affine DQ458920 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006), Y. affine AF521797 (Cho et al. 2003a), Ceramothamnion sinicola AY155529 (Cho et al. 2003b), C. pacificum GQ179801 (unpublished), C. codicola GQ179794 (unpublished), C. riosmenae JN712693 (Won and Cho 2011), C. interruptum AY155524 (Cho et al. 2003b), C. incospicuum LR031255 (unpublished), C. japonicum NC_031174 (Lee et al. 2016), C. japonicum FJ943668 (Yang et al. 2009), C. fujianum DQ458949 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006), C. dumosertum GQ252454 (unpublished), C. brasiliense DQ458921 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006), Carpoblepharis obsoletum FR871402 (Wolf et al. 2011), C. filicula DQ458942 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006), Ceramium botryocarpum AF439288 (Maggs et al. 2002), C. virgatum KT250272 (Bruce and Sanuders 2015), Celeceras pusillum FR871403 (Wolf et al. 2011), Centroceras clavulatum AY155533 (Cho et al. 2003b), C. clavulatum DQ458919 (De Barros-Barreto et al. 2006).

The average and minimum read mapping depths of the plastid assembly were 3,214 X and 336 X, respectively (Fig. S1). The complete plastid genome of Campylaephora boydenii (GenBank accession: OQ731916) was 171,790 bp in length with 27.7% GC content and 233 genes (154,497 bp; 89.8% of ptDNA; Table 1) including 200 protein-coding sequences (CDS), one group II intron, 28 transfer RNA (tRNA), three ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and one transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA). Most of CDS’ codons started with ATG (182 out of 200 total CDSs). However, there were five alternative start codons found in the C. boydenii ptDNA, such as ATA for seven CDS (i.e., cpcG, fabH, infB, petP, rpl19, ycf38, and orf259), GTG for five CDS (atpF, chlI, psaF, rbcS, and trxA), TTG for three CDS (petM, ycf27, and ycf65), ATT for two CDS (ycf37 and ycf80), and ATC for argB.

Table 1.

Summary of plastid genomes contents in the Ceramiaceae.

Characteristic Campylaephora boydenii
OQ731916
Campylaephora sungminbooi
NC_031211
Ceramothamnion japonicum
NC_031174
Length (base pair, bp)
Total 171,790 171,923 171,634
- Protein coding genes (CDS) 145,851 (84.9%) 143,028 (83.2%) 144,792 (84.4%)
- Intron 1,676 (0.97%) 1,676 (0.97%) 1,652 (0.96%)
- rRNA genes 4,455 (2.59%) 4,455 (2.59%) 4,455 (2.60%)
- tRNA genes 2,125 (1.24%) 2,125 (1.24%) 2,146 (1.25%)
Number of genes
Total 233 233 233
- CDS 200 200 200
- Intron 1 1 1
- rRNA genes 3 3 3
- tRNA genes 28 28 28
- tmRNA gene 1 1 1
GC content (%)
Total 27.7 27.6 27.8
- CDS 28.3 28.3 28.5
- Intron 20.3 20.6 20.6
- rRNA genes 46.6 46.9 46.3
- tRNA genes 53.1 53.3 52.7

We compared the plastid genome of C. boydenii (Fig. 3) to those of C. japonicum (NC_031174, 171,634 bp with 27.9% GC; Lee et al. 2016) and C. sungminbooi (NC_031211, 171,923 bp with 27.7% GC; Hughey and Boo 2016) (Table 1). There was no syntenic variation (reversion or translocation) found among species in genome alignment (Fig. S2). The gene contents (233 genes) and synteny are highly conserved (86.2% pairwise identity) among three ceramiacean species. At DNA level, pairwise identities of C. boydeniii ptDNA are 93.3% to C. sungminbooi and 82.1% to C. japonicum (cf. 82.4% between those of C. japonicum and C. sungminbooi). Of 200 CDS, four CDS shows significant difference (± 5%) in length, i.e., cpcG, petP, rpl33, and thiS. The length of cpcG (encodes phycobilisome rod-core linker protein) of C. japonicum is 696 bp, however, those of C. boydenii and C. sungminbooi both are 768 bp. In petP (encodes cytochrome b6-f complex subunit), C. sungminbooi shows 204 bp in length, and the other two species show 177 bp. The length of rpl33 (encodes ribosomal protein L33) is 246 bp for C. sungminbooi and those are 204 bp for C. boydenii and C. japonicum. For the last, the full length of thiS (encodes thiamine biosynthesis protein S) are 216 bp for C. japonicum and 333 bp for C. boydenii and C. sungminbooi. Three ribosomal RNA (5S, 16S, and 23S rRNA) show no significant difference in both length and DNA sequence among three Campylaephora species. Average pairwise sequence identity of three plastids are 96.6% for 5S rRNA (length = 117 bp, 41.6% GC content), 97.4% for 16S rRNA (1,477 bp, 48.9% GC), and 97.3% for 23S rRNA (2,747 bp, 45.6% GC). In general, the GC content of all rRNAs (46.6% for C. boydenii, 46.3% for C. japonicum, and 49.6% for C. sungminbooi) shows higher than those of CDS (28.3% for both C. boydenii and C. sungminbooi, and 28.5% for C. japonicum). The trnM is a unique tRNA that contains a group II intron including with an intronic-ORF in all Campylaephora ptDNA. In both C. boydenii and C. sungminbooi, the trnM includes an intron and intronic-ORF (orf364, 1,098 bp in length). The trnM of C. japonicum includes an intron and intronic-ORF (orf357, 1,071 bp).

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksp/2023-003-02/N0310030205/images/ksp_03_02_05_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

The plastid genome map of Campylaephora boydenii. Genes are color-coded by their functional classification. The colored boxes on the inside and outside of the circle are transcribed in a clockwise and counter-clockwise directions, respectively. A gray region of inner circle indicating the GC content.

Systematics and taxonomy of ceramialean red algae based on DNA (plastid marker, multi-genes, and genome) uncovered the genetic diversity of the group and morphological evolution of Rhodophyta (e.g., Zuccarello et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2008; Díaz-Tapia et al. 2017, 2019; Barros-Barreto et al. 2023). Despite of importance and usefulness of ceramialean ptDNA on genetic diversity, phylogeny, and evolution studies, however, a few plastids were reported as complete genomes (Hughey and Boo 2016; Lee et al. 2016; Díaz-Tapia et al. 2019). In order to increase our understanding of red algal genetic diversity in nature, additional complete plastid genomes will be required in the near future, such as Ceramium virgatum Roth, the type species of the family Ceramiaceae.

부록

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksp/2023-003-02/N0310030205/images/ksp_03_02_05_FS1.jpg
Supplementary Fig. S1.

The read mapping depths of the Campylaephora boydenii plastid genome.

https://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/ksp/2023-003-02/N0310030205/images/ksp_03_02_05_FS2.jpg
Supplementary Fig. S2.

The plastid genomes alignment of three ceramiacean species.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the NRF of Korea under the grants 2019R1A2C208856512 and 2022R1C1C2004043, and the research program (No. PEA0116) of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the accession no. OQ731916. Associated accession numbers are listed as BioProject PRJNA952380, SRR24070260, and Bio-sample SAMN34073937. A specimen used in the present study was deposited at the laboratory herbarium of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (www.kiost.ac.kr, Eun Chan Yang, ecyang@kiost.ac.kr) under the voucher number ECY.CB1905NSR.001.

References

1
Barros-Barreto MB, Jaramillo MA, Hommersand MH, Ferreira PCG and Maggs CA. 2023. Phylogenetic analysis of the red algal tribe Ceramieae reveals multiple morphological homoplasies but defines new genera. Cryptogam Algol 44, 13-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-algologie2023v44a2. 10.5252/cryptogamie-algologie2023v44a2
2
Boo SM and Lee IK. 1994. Ceramium and Campylaephora (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). In: (Akatsuka I ed.) Biology of economic algae. SPB Academic Publishers, The Hague. pp 1-33.
3
Bruce MR and Saunders GW. 2015. Population genetic analyses are consistent with the introduction of Ceramium secundatum (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) to Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA. Ecol. Evol. 5, 5088-5095. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1754. 10.1002/ece3.175426640684PMC4662316
4
Cho TO, Boo SM and Hansen GI. 2001. Structure and reproduction of the genus Ceramium (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Oregon, USA. Phycologia 40, 547-571. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-40-6-547.1. 10.2216/i0031-8884-40-6-547.1
5
Cho TO, Boo SM, Hommersand MH, Maggs CA, McIvor L and Fredericq S. 2008a. Gayliella gen. nov. in the tribe Ceramieae (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) based on molecular and morphological evidence. J. Phycol. 44, 721-738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00505.x. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00505.x27041431
6
Cho TO, Fredericq S and Boo SM. 2003a. Ceramium inkyuii sp. nov. (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) from Korea: A new species based on morphological and molecular evidence. J. Phycol. 39, 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02018.x. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02018.x
7
Cho TO, Fredericq S, Murray SN and Boo SM. 2003b. New insights in the taxonomy of the Ceramiium sinicoloa complex: resurrection of Ceramium interruptum (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 39, 775-788. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02161.x. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2003.02161.x
8
Cho TO, Hommersand MH, Won BY and Fredericq S. 2008b. Generic boundaries and phylogeny of Campylaephora (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta), including Campylaephora californica (Farlow) comb. nov. Phycologia 47, 321-333. https://doi.org/10.2216/PH07-75.1. 10.2216/PH07-75.1
9
Cho TO and Riosmena-Rodriguez R. 2008. Ceramium periconicum sp. nov. (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta): a new subtidal species from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Bot. Mar. 51, 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2008.039. 10.1515/BOT.2008.039
10
De Barros-Barreto MB, McIvor L, Maggs CA and Ferreira PCG. 2006. Molecular systematics of Ceramium and Centroceras (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) from Brazil. J. Phycol. 42, 905-921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00237.x. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00237.x
11
Díaz-Tapia P, Maggs CA, West JA and Verbruggen H. 2017. Analysis of chloroplast genomes and a supermatrix inform reclassification of the Rhodomelaceae (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 53, 920-937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.12553. 10.1111/jpy.1255328561261
12
Díaz-Tapia P, Pasella MM, Verbruggen H and Maggs CA. 2019. Morphological evolution and classification of the red algal order Ceramiales inferred using plastid phylogenomics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 137, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.04.022. 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.04.02231029748
13
Dierckxsens N, Mardulyn P and Smits G. 2017. NOVOPlasty: de novo assembly of organelle genomes from whole genome data. Nucl. Acids Res. 45, e18. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw955. 10.1093/nar/gkw95528204566PMC5389512
14
Greiner S, Lehwark P and Bock R. 2019. OrganellarGenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1: expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes. Nucl. Acids Res. 47, W59-W64. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz238. 10.1093/nar/gkz23830949694PMC6602502
15
Guiry MD and Guiry GM. 2023. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www. algaebase.org. Searched on 02 April 2023.
16
Hughey JR and Boo GH. 2016. Genomic and phylogenetic analysis of Ceramium cimbricum (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans supports the naming of a new invasive Pacific entity Ceramium sungminbooi sp. nov. Bot. Mar. 59, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2016-0036. 10.1515/bot-2016-0036
17
Lee J, Cho CH, Park SI, Choi JW, Song HS, West JA, Debashish B and Yoon HS. 2016. Parallel evolution of highly conserved plastid genome architecture in red seaweeds and seed plants. BMC Biology 14, 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0299-5. 10.1186/s12915-016-0299-527589960PMC5010701
18
Liu S, Ni Y, Li J, Zhang X, Yang H, Chen H and Liu C. 2023. CPGView: A package for visualizing detailed chloroplast genome structures. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 23, 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13729. 10.1111/1755-0998.1372936587992
19
Lin S-M, Fredericq S and Hommersand MH. 2001. Systematics of the Delesseriaceae (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) based on large subunit rDNA and rbcL sequences, including the Phycodryoideae, subfam. nov. J. Phycol. 37, 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01012.x. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.01012.x
20
Lowe TM and Chan PP. 2016. tRNAscan-SE On-line: integrating search and context for analysis of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W54-W57. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw413. 10.1093/nar/gkw41327174935PMC4987944
21
Maggs C A, Ward BA, McIvor LM, Evans CM, Rueness J and Stanhope MJ. 2002. Molecular analyses elucidate the taxonomy of fully corticated, nonspiny species of Ceramium (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) in the British Isles. Phycologia 41, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.2216/i0031-8884-41-4-409.1. 10.2216/i0031-8884-41-4-409.1
22
Ni Y, Li J, Zhang C and Liu C. 2023. Generating Sequencing Depth and Coverage Map for Organelle Genomes. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.4r3l27jkxg1y/v1. 10.17504/protocols.io.4r3l27jkxg1y/v1
23
Stamatakis A. 2014. RaxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312-1313. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu03324451623PMC3998144
24
Wolf MA, Sciuto K, Maggs CA, De Barros-Barreto MBB, Andreoli C and Moro I. 2011. Ceramium Roth (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta) from Venice lagoon (Adriatic Sea, Italy): comparative studies of Mediterranean and Atlantic taxa. Taxon 60, 1584-1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.606004. 10.1002/tax.606004
25
Won BY and Cho TO.2011. Ceramium riosmenae sp. nov. (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta): a new complete corticated species on Gracilaria from Baja California Sur, Mexico. Algae 26, 289-297. https://doi.org/10.4490/algae.2011.26.4.289. 10.4490/algae.2011.26.4.289
26
Yang EC and Boo SM. 2004. Evidence for two independent lineages of Griffithsia (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) based on plastid protein-coding psaA, psbA, and rbcL gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.014. 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.08.01415062802
27
Yang EC, Cho GY, Kogame K, Carlile AL and Boo SM. 2008. RuBisCO cistron sequence variation and phylogeography of Ceramium kondoi (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta). Bot. Mar. 51, 370-377. https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2008.051. 10.1515/BOT.2008.051
28
Yang EC, Kim KM, Kim SY, Lee J, Bo GH, Lee J-H, Nelson WA, Yi G, Schmidt WE, Fredericq S, Boo SM, Bhattacharya D and Yoon HS. 2015. Highly conserved mitochondrial genomes among multicellular red algae of the Florideophyceae. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 2394-2406. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv147. 10.1093/gbe/evv14726245677PMC4558864
29
Yang EC, Lee SY, Lee WJ and Boo SM. 2009. Molecular evidence for recolonization of Ceramium japonicum (Ceramiaceae, Rhodophyta) on the west coast of Korea after the last glacial maximum. Bot. Mar. 52, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1515/BOT.2009.00510.1515/BOT.2009.005
30
Zuccarello GC, Sandercock B and West JA. 2002. Diversity within red algal species: variation in world-wide samples of Spyridia filamentosa (Ceramiaceae) and Murrayella periclados (Rhodomelaceae) using DNA markers and breeding studies. Eur. J. Phycol. 37, 403-417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0967026202003827. 10.1017/S0967026202003827
페이지 상단으로 이동하기